GeForce GT 650M
VS
FirePro V5800

GeForce GT 650M vs FirePro V5800

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
VS

FirePro V5800

2010Core: 690 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 650M is positioned at rank 188 and the FirePro V5800 is on rank 269, so the GeForce GT 650M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 650M

#178
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
366%
#180
332%
#181
331%
#185
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
301%
#186
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
299%
#188
GeForce GT 650M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
95%
#197
94%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5800

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
95%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
94%
#254
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5981%
#269
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
100%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
100%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
99%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
98%
#274
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
96%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
95%
#278
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
94%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
91%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
89%
#281
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
89%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 650M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V5800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 650MFirePro V5800
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 650M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 650M and FirePro V5800

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

The GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,187 points.

AMD

FirePro V5800

The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 650M scores 1,187 and the FirePro V5800 reaches 1,184 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 650M is built on Kepler while the FirePro V5800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 650M) vs 800 (FirePro V5800). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 650M) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800).

FeatureGeForce GT 650MFirePro V5800
G3D Mark Score
1,187
1,184
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS
1.104 TFLOPS+51%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
80 KB+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 650MFirePro V5800
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 650M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V5800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V5800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MFirePro V5800
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 650M) vs 11.2 (FirePro V5800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MFirePro V5800
DirectX
12 (FL11_0)+7%
11.2
Vulkan
1.3
None
OpenGL
4.5+2%
4.4
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 650M) vs No (FirePro V5800). Decoder: VP5 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2 (GeForce GT 650M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V5800).

FeatureGeForce GT 650MFirePro V5800
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
No
Decoder
VP5
UVD 2.3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 650M draws 45W versus the FirePro V5800's 74W — a 48.7% difference. The GeForce GT 650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 650M) vs 350W (FirePro V5800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 59°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MFirePro V5800
TDP
45W-39%
74W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
59°C-31%
Perf/Watt
26.4+65%
16.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 650M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GT 650MFirePro V5800
MSRP
$479
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Codename
GK107
Juniper
Release
March 22 2012
April 26 2010
Ranking
#828
#780