GeForce GT 650M
VS
GeForce GT 640

GeForce GT 650M vs GeForce GT 640

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640

2012Core: 902 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 650M is positioned at rank 188 and the GeForce GT 640 is on rank 107, so the GeForce GT 640 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 650M

#178
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
366%
#180
332%
#181
331%
#185
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
301%
#186
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
299%
#188
GeForce GT 650M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
95%
#197
94%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 640

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
614%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
590%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
583%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
582%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
581%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
578%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
570%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
568%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
563%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
562%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
555%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
554%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
544%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
543%
#92
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
677%
#107
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
100%
#108
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
100%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
95%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
94%
#115
GeForce 605
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
93%
#116
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
92%
#117
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
89%
#119
Radeon 535
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
89%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 650M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 640 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 650MGeForce GT 640
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 650M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 650M and GeForce GT 640

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

The GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,187 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640

The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 650M scores 1,187 and the GeForce GT 640 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 650M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 640 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 650M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 640). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 650M) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640).

FeatureGeForce GT 650MGeForce GT 640
G3D Mark Score
1,187+2%
1,169
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS+5%
0.6927 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 650MGeForce GT 640
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 650M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 640 has 4 GB. The GeForce GT 640 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MGeForce GT 640
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 650M) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 640). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MGeForce GT 640
DirectX
12 (FL11_0)+9%
11.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 650M) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640). Decoder: VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2 (GeForce GT 650M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640).

FeatureGeForce GT 650MGeForce GT 640
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
NVENC 1.0
Decoder
VP5
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 650M draws 45W versus the GeForce GT 640's 65W — a 36.4% difference. The GeForce GT 650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 650M) vs 300W (GeForce GT 640). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 60°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 650MGeForce GT 640
TDP
45W-31%
65W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
145mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
60°C-29%
Perf/Watt
26.4+47%
18.0