CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank 15 and the Arc Graphics 140V is on rank 308, so the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design and Arc Graphics 140V
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 5,310 and the Arc Graphics 140V reaches 5,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Arc Graphics 140V uses Xe², both on 14 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140V). Boost clocks: 1417 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,310+3% | 5,168 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Xe² |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+9500% | 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1417 MHz | 2050 MHz+45% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 75W versus the Arc Graphics 140V's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140V). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.8 | 344.5+387% |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $300 |
| Codename | GP107 | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | January 3 2018 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #429 | #434 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design and Arc Graphics 140V
