GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro Vega 20

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018Core: 1152 MHzBoost: 1417 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 20

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1283 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro Vega 20: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Pro Vega 20 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 20 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Pro Vega 20

2018

Why buy it

  • 22.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro Vega 20 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design instead at 5,310 vs 5,169, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro Vega 20 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 20

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 5,310 and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 reaches 5,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Raw compute: 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Boost clocks: 1417 MHz vs 1283 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro Vega 20
G3D Mark Score
5,310+3%
5,169
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 5.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768
1280+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.177 TFLOPS
3.284 TFLOPS+51%
Boost Clock
1417 MHz+10%
1283 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
80+67%
L1 Cache
288 KB
320 KB+11%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro Vega 20
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 20.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro Vega 20
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro Vega 20
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro Vega 20
Encoder
NVENC (6th Gen)
VCE 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro Vega 20
TDP
75W-25%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80
Perf/Watt
70.8+37%
51.7