
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro K6000

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Quadro K6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank 9 and the Quadro K6000 is on rank 319, so the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (12 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (265mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $300), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 194.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+194.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design and Quadro K6000

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,853 points.

Quadro K6000
The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design scores 7,853 and the Quadro K6000 reaches 7,993 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Quadro K6000 uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,880 (Quadro K6000). Raw compute: 3.789 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 902 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,853 | 7,993+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2880+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.789 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz+64% | 902 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB+100% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro K6000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) — a 64.8% advantage for the Quadro K6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 211 GB/s+65% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 11.0 (Quadro K6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1+10% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Quadro K6000's 225W — a 95.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Quadro K6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 265mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-64% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 265mm |
| Height | 0mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 98.2+177% | 35.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design costs 66.7% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 78.5 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 26.6 (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers 195.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5265 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-67% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 78.5+195% | 26.6 |
| Codename | GP106 | GK110B |
| Release | June 27 2017 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #401 | #318 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















