GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro K6000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

2017Core: 1063 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

2013Core: 797 MHzBoost: 902 MHz
Similar parts
···

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro K6000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro K6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro K6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).

Quadro K6000

2013

Why buy it

  • 7.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (7,993 vs 7,853), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K6000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro K6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,853 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design scores 7,853 and the Quadro K6000 reaches 7,993 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Quadro K6000 uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,880 (Quadro K6000). Raw compute: 3.789 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 902 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignQuadro K6000
G3D Mark Score
7,853
7,993+2%
Architecture
Pascal
Kepler
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
2880+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.789 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS+37%
Boost Clock
1480 MHz+64%
902 MHz
ROPs
48
48
TMUs
80
240+200%
L1 Cache
480 KB+100%
240 KB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignQuadro K6000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K6000 carries 12 GB. Quadro K6000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) — a 64.8% advantage for the Quadro K6000. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design and 256-bit on the Quadro K6000.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignQuadro K6000
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
12 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
211 GB/s+65%
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 11.0 (Quadro K6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignQuadro K6000
DirectX
12.1+10%
11.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignQuadro K6000
Encoder
NVENC 6.0
NVENC 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP8
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Quadro K6000's 225W — a 95.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Quadro K6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 265mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignQuadro K6000
TDP
80W-64%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
265mm
Height
0mm
110mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
98.2+177%
35.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignQuadro K6000
MSRP
$5265
Codename
GP106
GK110B
Release
June 27 2017
July 23 2013
Ranking
#401
#318

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.