GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Radeon Pro V520
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro V520 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro V520 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro V520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
2017Why buy it
- ✅17.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Radeon Pro V520
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro V520 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,853 points.
Radeon Pro V520
The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design scores 7,853 and the Radeon Pro V520 reaches 8,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro V520 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520). Raw compute: 3.789 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1600 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,853 | 8,000+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2304+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.789 TFLOPS | 7.373 TFLOPS+95% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 1600 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 144+80% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro V520 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V520 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro V520. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520) — the Radeon Pro V520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro V520's 225W — a 95.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Radeon Pro V520). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-64% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 98.2+176% | 35.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro V520 (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro V520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $800 |
| Codename | GP106 | Navi 12 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #401 | #218 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design and Radeon Pro V520
