GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs T1200 Mobile

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

2017Core: 1063 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS

T1200 Mobile

2021Core: 855 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs T1200 Mobile Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs T1200 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

2017

Why buy it

  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

T1200 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (7,853 vs 7,805), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T1200 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, T1200 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design vs T1200 Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,853 points.

T1200 Mobile

The T1200 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,805 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design scores 7,853 and the T1200 Mobile reaches 7,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the T1200 Mobile uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,024 (T1200 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignT1200 Mobile
G3D Mark Score
7,853
7,805
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
16 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1280+25%
1024
Boost Clock
1480 MHz+4%
1425 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T1200 Mobile leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignT1200 Mobile
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB of VRAM, while the T1200 Mobile carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design and 128-bit on the T1200 Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignT1200 Mobile
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (T1200 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignT1200 Mobile
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 6.0 (T1200 Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1200 Mobile).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignT1200 Mobile
Encoder
NVENC 6.0
NVENC 6.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP8
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the T1200 Mobile's 95W — a 17.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (T1200 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q DesignT1200 Mobile
TDP
80W-16%
95W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
98.2+19%
82.2