G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅219.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 219.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 259% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 6,309), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design scores 6,309 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 259%. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2535 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	6,309	22,651+259%
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1024	4352+325%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.458 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS+797%
Boost Clock	1200 MHz	2535 MHz+111%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	64	136+113%
L1 Cache	1 MB	4.3 MB+330%
L2 Cache	1 MB	32 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 157.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	288 GB/s+157%
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	32 MB+3100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC (4th Gen)	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 104.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP	50W-69%	160W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	—	240mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	126.2	141.6+12%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2020).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP	—	$399
Codename	TU117	AD106
Release	April 2 2020	May 18 2023
Ranking	#371	#59

Search GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.