
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌65.1% HIGHER MSRP$279 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 120W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 120W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti leads by 18.6%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1470 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,747+19% | 10,749 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2304+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.437 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+25% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+20% | 1470 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+33% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2.3 MB+53% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+71% | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+100% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 52.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 70W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 300W-33% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 229mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 106.2 | 153.6+45% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti came in at $279, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 39.4% cheaper ($110 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 39.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279 | $169-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.7 | 63.6+39% |
| Codename | TU116 | GA107 |
| Release | February 22 2019 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #204 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














