G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 275

2009

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 896 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2009 hardware with 896 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
47.3% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅348.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1074% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅585.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 896 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 348.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 696.8% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 1,349), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 896 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 55nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $80 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1074% (63.6 vs 5.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 275

The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 275 scores 1,349 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 696.8%. The GeForce GTX 275 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 55 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 275	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score	1,349	10,749+697%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	55 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	240	2304+860%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6739 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS+905%
ROPs	28	32+14%
TMUs	80+11%	72
L2 Cache	0.22 MB	2 MB+809%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 275 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 275	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 275 has 896 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 585.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 275 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.22 MB (GeForce GTX 275) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 275	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity	0.875 GB	6 GB+586%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	168 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+33%	96-bit
L2 Cache	0.22 MB	2 MB+809%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 275	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX	11 (10_0)	12 Ultimate+9%
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GTX 275) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 275	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder	No	NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP2	NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 275 draws 219W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 103.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 275) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 275	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP	219W	70W-68%
Recommended PSU	550W	300W-45%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	None
Length	267mm	160mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	6.2	153.6+2377%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 275 came in at $249, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 32.1% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1077.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GTX 275	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP	$249	$169-32%
Performance per Dollar	5.4	63.6+1078%
Codename	GT200B	GA107
Release	January 15 2009	February 2 2024
Ranking	#789	#252

Search GeForce GTX 275 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.