GeForce GTX 275
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 275
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 896 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2009 hardware with 896 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅845.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 947.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅814.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 896 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 275
The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 275 scores 1,349 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1579.1%. The GeForce GTX 275 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,349 | 22,651+1579% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 4352+1713% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6739 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+3173% |
| ROPs | 28 | 48+71% |
| TMUs | 80 | 136+70% |
| L2 Cache | 0.22 MB | 32 MB+14445% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 275 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 275 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 275 has 896 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 814.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 275 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.22 MB (GeForce GTX 275) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.875 GB | 8 GB+814% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.22 MB | 32 MB+14445% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_0) | 12.2+11% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GTX 275) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 275 draws 219W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 31.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 275) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 160W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 550W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 6.2 | 141.6+2184% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 275 came in at $249, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 275 was 37.6% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 951.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-38% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 56.8+952% |
| Codename | GT200B | AD106 |
| Release | January 15 2009 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #789 | #59 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 275 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
