
GeForce GTX 285

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 1060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 1060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 285
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌44.2% HIGHER MSRP$359 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($359 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅419.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 883.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅GeForce GTX 285 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 285
The GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 23 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 648 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $359.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 285 scores 1,475 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 582.3%. The GeForce GTX 285 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 285) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.7085 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 285) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475 | 10,064+582% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 2560+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7085 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+1152% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 285 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 285 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 285) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 6 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 285) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | — | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 285 draws 204W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 12.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 285) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 204W | 180W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 400W-27% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | — | 173mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.2 | 55.9+676% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 285 came in at $359, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 30.6% cheaper ($110 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (GeForce GTX 285) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 885.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $359 | $249-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1 | 40.4+885% |
| Codename | GT200B | GP104 |
| Release | December 23 2008 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #771 | #137 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















