GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285

2008Core: 648 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 285

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 140.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $359 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($359 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 234.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $210 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1185.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • GeForce GTX 285 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 234.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 433.5% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 1,475), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $210 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $359, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1185.4% (52.8 vs 4.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285

The GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 23 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 648 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $359.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 285 scores 1,475 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 433.5%. The GeForce GTX 285 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 55 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 285) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.7085 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 285) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
1,475
7,869+433%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Turing
Process Node
55 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
240
896+273%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7085 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+321%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+43%
56
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 285 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 285 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 285) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 285) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 285 draws 204W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 92.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 285) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
204W
75W-63%
Recommended PSU
550W
300W-45%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
7.2
104.9+1357%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 285 came in at $359, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 58.5% cheaper ($210 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (GeForce GTX 285) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1187.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$359
$149-58%
Performance per Dollar
4.1
52.8+1188%
Codename
GT200B
TU117
Release
December 23 2008
April 23 2019
Ranking
#771
#323

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.