GeForce GTX 460 OEM
VS
Arc A370M

GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Arc A370M

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

2010Core: 650 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
Intel

Arc A370M

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1550 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 460 OEM
150
5,000
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 770M
brand logoGeForce GTX 590
brand logoGeForce GTX 750 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 660 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 5GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Arc A370M
35
5,115
+2.3%
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc Graphics 130V
brand logoArc 7-Cores iGPU
brand logoArc B570

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A370M

#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
88%
#201
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
422%
#203
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
383%
#204
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
382%
#208
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
347%
#209
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
345%
#211
Arc A370M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
100%
#216
Radeon 8040S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
95%
#217
Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
95%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
92%
#222
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
MSRP: $150|Avg: $75
91%
#224
GeForce GT 640M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc A370M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The Arc A370M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc A370M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 OEM.

InsightGeForce GTX 460 OEMArc A370M
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%)
✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A370M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM Benchmark Check

Arc A370M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low57 FPS
medium33 FPS
high30 FPS
ultra23 FPS
1440p
low38 FPS
medium22 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra16 FPS
4K
low12 FPS
medium8 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra5 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low95 FPS
medium56 FPS
high39 FPS
ultra21 FPS
1440p
low61 FPS
medium35 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra14 FPS
4K
low18 FPS
medium13 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra6 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low230 FPS
medium184 FPS
high127 FPS
ultra78 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS
medium103 FPS
high78 FPS
ultra49 FPS
4K
low71 FPS
medium56 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra26 FPS
League of Legends
No prediction data available
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low230 FPS
medium184 FPS
high153 FPS
ultra115 FPS
1440p
low173 FPS
medium138 FPS
high115 FPS
ultra86 FPS
4K
low115 FPS
medium92 FPS
high77 FPS
ultra58 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low99 FPS
medium75 FPS
high61 FPS
ultra44 FPS
1440p
low85 FPS
medium63 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra33 FPS
4K
low48 FPS
medium37 FPS
high22 FPS
ultra17 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low151 FPS
medium126 FPS
high106 FPS
ultra69 FPS
1440p
low136 FPS
medium118 FPS
high93 FPS
ultra58 FPS
4K
low65 FPS
medium56 FPS
high36 FPS
ultra23 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 OEM and Arc A370M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Intel

Arc A370M

The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM scores 5,000 and the Arc A370M reaches 5,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is built on Fermi while the Arc A370M uses Generation 12.7, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 1,024 (Arc A370M). Raw compute: 0.8736 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMArc A370M
G3D Mark Score
5,000
5,115+2%
Architecture
Fermi
Generation 12.7
Process Node
40 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
336
1024+205%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8736 TFLOPS
3.174 TFLOPS+263%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
64+14%
L1 Cache
0.44 MB
1.5 MB+241%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMArc A370M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
XeSS
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A370M has 4 GB. The Arc A370M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 108.8 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) — a 2.9% advantage for the Arc A370M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 4 MB (Arc A370M) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMArc A370M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
108.8 GB/s
112 GB/s+3%
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMArc A370M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A370M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMArc A370M
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
Xe Media Engine
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
Xe Media Engine
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM draws 150W versus the Arc A370M's 35W — a 124.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 350W (Arc A370M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 210mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMArc A370M
TDP
150W
35W-77%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
210mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-22%
90
Perf/Watt
33.3
146.1+339%