GeForce GTX 460 OEM
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1650

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

2010Core: 650 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 460 OEM
150
5,000
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 770M
brand logoGeForce GTX 590
brand logoGeForce GTX 750 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 660 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 5GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1650
75
7,869
+57.4%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 57.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 OEM.

InsightGeForce GTX 460 OEMGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-57.4%)
✅Leading raw performance (+57.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 460 OEM Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low57 FPS
medium33 FPS
high30 FPS
ultra23 FPS
1440p
low38 FPS
medium22 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra16 FPS
4K
low12 FPS
medium8 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra5 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low109 FPS
medium95 FPS
high74 FPS
ultra62 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS
medium72 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra51 FPS
4K
low35 FPS
medium32 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low141 FPS
medium102 FPS
high81 FPS
ultra66 FPS
1440p
low75 FPS
medium58 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra31 FPS
4K
low30 FPS
medium22 FPS
high16 FPS
ultra13 FPS
League of Legends
No prediction data available
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low307 FPS
medium283 FPS
high236 FPS
ultra177 FPS
1440p
low186 FPS
medium185 FPS
high156 FPS
ultra124 FPS
4K
low71 FPS
medium65 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra46 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low99 FPS
medium75 FPS
high61 FPS
ultra44 FPS
1440p
low85 FPS
medium63 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra33 FPS
4K
low48 FPS
medium37 FPS
high22 FPS
ultra17 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low271 FPS
medium236 FPS
high203 FPS
ultra177 FPS
1440p
low196 FPS
medium180 FPS
high158 FPS
ultra126 FPS
4K
low101 FPS
medium82 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra43 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 OEM and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 460 OEM scores 5,000 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 57.4%. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.8736 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
5,000
7,869+57%
Architecture
Fermi
Turing
Process Node
40 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
336
896+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8736 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+242%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
56
L1 Cache
448 KB
896 KB+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 108.8 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 17.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
108.8 GB/s
128 GB/s+18%
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 210mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
450W
300W-33%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
None
Length
210mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
70°C
Perf/Watt
33.3
104.9+215%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 OEMGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
—
$149
Avg Price (30d)
—
$75
Codename
GF104
TU117
Release
October 11 2010
April 23 2019
Ranking
#829
#323