
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Popular choices:

FirePro V7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 v2.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 460 v2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $96), it costs 48% less, resulting in a 90.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+90.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($96) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 v2 and FirePro V7800

GeForce GTX 460 v2
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 779 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,016 points. Launch price was $199.

FirePro V7800
The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 scores 2,016 and the FirePro V7800 reaches 2,028 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the FirePro V7800 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7800). Raw compute: 1.046 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,016 | 2,028 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 1280+281% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.046 TFLOPS | 1.856 TFLOPS+77% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+40% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V7800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V7800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 512 KB (FirePro V7800) — the FirePro V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 11.2 (FirePro V7800). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0)+7% | 11.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4+7% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Legacy (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs None (FirePro V7800). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7800).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Legacy | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 draws 160W versus the FirePro V7800's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The FirePro V7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 350W (FirePro V7800). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 210mm vs 254mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 210mm | 254mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.6 | 13.5+7% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the FirePro V7800 launched at $759 and now averages $96. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 costs 47.9% less ($46 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.3 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) vs 21.1 (FirePro V7800) — the GeForce GTX 460 v2 offers 91% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-74% | $759 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-48% | $96 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.3+91% | 21.1 |
| Codename | GF114 | Cayman |
| Release | September 24 2011 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #679 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















