GeForce GTX 470M
VS
GeForce GTX 460 SE

GeForce GTX 470M vs GeForce GTX 460 SE

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 470M

2010Core: 535 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 SE

2010Core: 650 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 470M is positioned at rank #38 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 470M

#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
89%
#28
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
167%
#30
151%
#31
151%
#35
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
137%
#36
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
136%
#38
GeForce GTX 470M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#46
Radeon RX 5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
91%
#48
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
91%
#49
GeForce 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
90%
#50
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75
89%
#53
GeForce GTX 980M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 470M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 470MGeForce GTX 460 SE
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 460 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 470M and GeForce GTX 460 SE

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 470M

The GeForce GTX 470M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 535 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,953 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 SE

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 470M scores 1,953 and the GeForce GTX 460 SE reaches 1,988 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 470M is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 460 SE uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Raw compute: 0.6163 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MGeForce GTX 460 SE
G3D Mark Score
1,953
1,988+2%
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
288
288
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6163 TFLOPS
0.7488 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
48
48
L1 Cache
384 KB
384 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MGeForce GTX 460 SE
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 470M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 470M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the GeForce GTX 460 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MGeForce GTX 460 SE
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB+50%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MGeForce GTX 460 SE
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 470M) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 470M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 460 SE).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MGeForce GTX 460 SE
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 470M draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 460 SE's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 470M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MGeForce GTX 460 SE
TDP
75W-50%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
210mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
26.0+95%
13.3