
GeForce GTX 480 vs FirePro W8000

GeForce GTX 480
Popular choices:

FirePro W8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W8000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 480.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 480 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 480 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 480 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $1,599), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1429.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 480 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1429.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 480 and FirePro W8000

GeForce GTX 480
The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.

FirePro W8000
The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 480 scores 4,075 and the FirePro W8000 reaches 4,259 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480 is built on Fermi while the FirePro W8000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 1,792 (FirePro W8000). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,075 | 4,259+5% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1792+273% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.345 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+140% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60 | 112+87% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+114% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 480 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W8000 has 4 GB. The FirePro W8000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce GTX 480) vs 512 KB (FirePro W8000) — the GeForce GTX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB | 4 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+500% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480) vs 12 (FirePro W8000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 6+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W8000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 480 draws 250W versus the FirePro W8000's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The FirePro W8000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 480) vs 350W (FirePro W8000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 279mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 58°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 225W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 279mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 58°C-36% |
| Perf/Watt | 16.3 | 18.9+16% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 480 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the FirePro W8000 launched at $1599 and now averages $1599. The GeForce GTX 480 costs 93.7% less ($1499 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.8 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 2.7 (FirePro W8000) — the GeForce GTX 480 offers 1411.1% better value. The FirePro W8000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-69% | $1599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-94% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.8+1411% | 2.7 |
| Codename | GF100 | Tahiti |
| Release | March 26 2010 | June 14 2012 |
| Ranking | #488 | #481 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















