GeForce GTX 480
VS
FirePro W8000

GeForce GTX 480 vs FirePro W8000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 480

2010Core: 700 MHz
VS

FirePro W8000

2012Core: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8000

#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
97%
#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
88%
#245
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5554%
#260
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
100%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#262
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
99%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
97%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#266
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#267
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
94%
#269
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
93%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
92%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
92%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
91%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W8000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 480.

InsightGeForce GTX 480FirePro W8000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%)
Leading raw performance (+4.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+166.7%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)
Standard Size (279mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 480 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 480 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $1,599), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1429.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 480FirePro W8000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1429.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($100)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 480 and FirePro W8000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 480

The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

FirePro W8000

The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 480 scores 4,075 and the FirePro W8000 reaches 4,259 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480 is built on Fermi while the FirePro W8000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 1,792 (FirePro W8000). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 480FirePro W8000
G3D Mark Score
4,075
4,259+5%
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
1792+273%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.345 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS+140%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
60
112+87%
L1 Cache
960 KB+114%
448 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 480FirePro W8000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 480 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W8000 has 4 GB. The FirePro W8000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce GTX 480) vs 512 KB (FirePro W8000) — the GeForce GTX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480FirePro W8000
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB
4 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
384-bit+500%
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480) vs 12 (FirePro W8000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480FirePro W8000
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
6+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W8000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 480FirePro W8000
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 480 draws 250W versus the FirePro W8000's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The FirePro W8000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 480) vs 350W (FirePro W8000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 279mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 58°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480FirePro W8000
TDP
250W
225W-10%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
279mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
58°C-36%
Perf/Watt
16.3
18.9+16%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 480 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the FirePro W8000 launched at $1599 and now averages $1599. The GeForce GTX 480 costs 93.7% less ($1499 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.8 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 2.7 (FirePro W8000) — the GeForce GTX 480 offers 1411.1% better value. The FirePro W8000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 480FirePro W8000
MSRP
$499-69%
$1599
Avg Price (30d)
$100-94%
$1599
Performance per Dollar
40.8+1411%
2.7
Codename
GF100
Tahiti
Release
March 26 2010
June 14 2012
Ranking
#488
#481