GeForce GTX 480 vs Quadro M2000
GeForce GTX 480
Popular choices:
Quadro M2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro M2000 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The Quadro M2000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 480 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 480 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 480 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $100), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 97.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 480 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 480 and Quadro M2000
GeForce GTX 480
The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.
Quadro M2000
The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 480 scores 4,075 and the Quadro M2000 reaches 4,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480 is built on Fermi while the Quadro M2000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 768 (Quadro M2000). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480) vs 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,075+1% | 4,026 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 768+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.345 TFLOPS | 1.786 TFLOPS+33% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60+25% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+233% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 480 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000 has 4 GB. The Quadro M2000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 480) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB | 4 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+500% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480) vs 12_1 (Quadro M2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 480 draws 250W versus the Quadro M2000's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 480) vs 350W (Quadro M2000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.3 | 53.7+229% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 480 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Quadro M2000 launched at $0 and now averages $50. The Quadro M2000 costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.8 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 80.5 (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 offers 97.3% better value. The Quadro M2000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $50-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.8 | 80.5+97% |
| Codename | GF100 | GM206 |
| Release | March 26 2010 | April 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #488 | #491 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 480 and Quadro M2000
