GeForce GTX 480 vs Radeon RX 460
GeForce GTX 480
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 460
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 460 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The Radeon RX 460 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 480 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 460 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 480.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 460 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 460 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $100), it costs 65% less, resulting in a 187.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+187.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 480 and Radeon RX 460
GeForce GTX 480
The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.
Radeon RX 460
The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 480 scores 4,075 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480 is built on Fermi while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,075 | 4,099 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 896+87% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.345 TFLOPS | 2.15 TFLOPS+60% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 60+7% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+329% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 480 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 460 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 177.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 480) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 460) — a 58.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 480. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 480) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB | 4 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s+58% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460). Vulkan: 1.2 vs Supported. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | Supported |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 460).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 480 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 480) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | 170mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.3 | 54.7+236% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 480 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon RX 460 launched at $110 and now averages $35. The Radeon RX 460 costs 65% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.8 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 117.1 (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 offers 187% better value. The Radeon RX 460 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $110-78% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $35-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.8 | 117.1+187% |
| Codename | GF100 | Baffin |
| Release | March 26 2010 | August 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #488 | #485 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 480 and Radeon RX 460
