GeForce GTX 480 vs Quadro M2200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 480

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

2017Core: 695 MHzBoost: 1036 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 480 vs Quadro M2200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 480 vs Quadro M2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 480 vs Quadro M2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 480

2010

Why buy it

  • 11.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 354.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 55W.

Quadro M2200

2017

Why buy it

  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 55W instead of 250W, a 195W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 480 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 480 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M2200 instead at 4,294 vs 4,075, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 480 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M2200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 more expensive on MSRP at $500 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5.2% (8.6 vs 8.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M2200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 480 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 480 vs Quadro M2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 480

The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.

NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 480 scores 4,075 versus the Quadro M2200's 4,294 — the Quadro M2200 leads by 5.4%. The GeForce GTX 480 is built on Fermi while the Quadro M2200 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 1,024 (Quadro M2200). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480) vs 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 480Quadro M2200
G3D Mark Score
4,075
4,294+5%
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
1024+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.345 TFLOPS
2.122 TFLOPS+58%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
60
64+7%
L1 Cache
960 KB+150%
384 KB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 480 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480Quadro M2200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 480 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2200 carries 4 GB. Quadro M2200 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 480 and 64-bit on the Quadro M2200. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 480) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2200) — the Quadro M2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480Quadro M2200
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB
4 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
384-bit+500%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480Quadro M2200
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs 2nd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 480Quadro M2200
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
2nd Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 480 draws 250W versus the Quadro M2200's 55W — a 127.9% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 480) vs 350W (Quadro M2200). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480Quadro M2200
TDP
250W
55W-78%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
90°C
80°C-11%
Perf/Watt
16.3
78.1+379%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 480 came in at $499, while the Quadro M2200 launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 480 was 0.2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 8.6 (Quadro M2200) — the Quadro M2200 offers 4.9% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 480Quadro M2200
MSRP
$499
$500
Performance per Dollar
8.2
8.6+5%
Codename
GF100
GM206
Release
March 26 2010
January 11 2017
Ranking
#488
#479

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.