GeForce GTX 480
VS
GRID P6-2Q

GeForce GTX 480 vs GRID P6-2Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 480

2010Core: 700 MHz
VS

GRID P6-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-2Q

#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
100%
#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
99%
#281
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7537%
#296
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
100%
#299
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
99%
#301
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
99%
#302
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
97%
#303
FirePro 3D V3700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
92%
#304
GRID T4-1Q
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600
90%
#305
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
88%
#306
NVS 310
MSRP: $159|Avg: $10
88%
#308
FirePro 3D V3750
MSRP: $199|Avg: $25
87%
#309
NVS 810
MSRP: $700|Avg: $80
87%
#310
GRID P40-2Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340
86%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 480 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID P6-2Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 480GRID P6-2Q
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 480 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 480 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $150), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 55.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 480GRID P6-2Q
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+55.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($100)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 480 and GRID P6-2Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 480

The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.

NVIDIA

GRID P6-2Q

The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 480 scores 4,075 and the GRID P6-2Q reaches 3,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480 is built on Fermi while the GRID P6-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 480GRID P6-2Q
G3D Mark Score
4,075+4%
3,926
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
2048+327%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.345 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+259%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
60
128+113%
L1 Cache
960 KB+25%
768 KB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 480GRID P6-2Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 480 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-2Q has 2 GB. The GRID P6-2Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 480) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-2Q) — the GRID P6-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480GRID P6-2Q
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB
2 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
384-bit+500%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480GRID P6-2Q
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480) vs NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID P6-2Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 480GRID P6-2Q
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVENC 4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVDEC 3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 480 draws 250W versus the GRID P6-2Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID P6-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 480) vs 350W (GRID P6-2Q). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 480GRID P6-2Q
TDP
250W
225W-10%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
16.3
17.4+7%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 480 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GRID P6-2Q launched at $2000 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 480 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.8 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 26.2 (GRID P6-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 480 offers 55.7% better value. The GRID P6-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 480GRID P6-2Q
MSRP
$499-75%
$2000
Avg Price (30d)
$100-33%
$150
Performance per Dollar
40.8+56%
26.2
Codename
GF100
GM204
Release
March 26 2010
August 30 2015
Ranking
#488
#433