
GeForce GTX 480 vs GRID P6-2Q

GeForce GTX 480
Popular choices:

GRID P6-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 480 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID P6-2Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 480 | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 480 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 480 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $150), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 55.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 480 | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 480 and GRID P6-2Q

GeForce GTX 480
The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.

GRID P6-2Q
The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 480 scores 4,075 and the GRID P6-2Q reaches 3,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480 is built on Fermi while the GRID P6-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,075+4% | 3,926 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 2048+327% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.345 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+259% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 60 | 128+113% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 480 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-2Q has 2 GB. The GRID P6-2Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 480) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-2Q) — the GRID P6-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB | 2 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+500% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480) vs NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID P6-2Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 480 draws 250W versus the GRID P6-2Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID P6-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 480) vs 350W (GRID P6-2Q). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 225W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.3 | 17.4+7% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 480 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GRID P6-2Q launched at $2000 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 480 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.8 (GeForce GTX 480) vs 26.2 (GRID P6-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 480 offers 55.7% better value. The GRID P6-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480 | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-75% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-33% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.8+56% | 26.2 |
| Codename | GF100 | GM204 |
| Release | March 26 2010 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #488 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















