GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Popular choices:
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is positioned at rank #227 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 485M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 485M SLI and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,360 points.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI scores 3,360 and the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 reaches 3,331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,360 | 3,331 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+300% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI draws 100W versus the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2's 106W — a 5.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 92°C vs 68°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M SLI | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-6% | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 92°C | 68°C-26% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.6+7% | 31.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 485M SLI and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
