GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $48), it costs 6% less, resulting in a 9.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+9.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($48) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $349.
GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 scores 5,500 and the GeForce GTX 950 reaches 5,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 950 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 950). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500+3% | 5,357 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 768+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 1.825 TFLOPS+30% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60+25% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+233% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) — a 47.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 950 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 156 GB/s+47% | 106 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 draws 219W versus the GeForce GTX 950's 90W — a 83.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 202mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 90W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 202mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1 | 59.5+137% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 and now averages $48. The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 costs 6.3% less ($3 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 122.2 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 111.6 (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 offers 9.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 950 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $159-54% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-6% | $48 |
| Performance per Dollar | 122.2+9% | 111.6 |
| Codename | GF110 | GM206 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | August 20 2015 |
| Ranking | #610 | #425 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and GeForce GTX 950
