
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 950 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 950 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
2010Why buy it
- ✅24.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌119.5% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌143.3% higher power demand at 219W vs 90W.
- ❌32.2% longer card at 267mm vs 202mm.
GeForce GTX 950
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 113.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 219W, a 129W reduction.
- ✅Measures 202mm instead of 267mm, a 65mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 950 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 scores 5,500 and the GeForce GTX 950 reaches 5,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 950 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 950). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500+3% | 5,357 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 768+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 1.825 TFLOPS+30% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60+25% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+233% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) — a 47.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 950 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 156 GB/s+47% | 106 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 draws 219W versus the GeForce GTX 950's 90W — a 83.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 202mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 90W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 202mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1 | 59.5+137% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 came in at $349, while the GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950 was 54.4% cheaper ($190 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.8 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 113.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 950 (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $159-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.8 | 33.7+113% |
| Codename | GF110 | GM206 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | August 20 2015 |
| Ranking | #610 | #425 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















