
GeForce GTX 650 vs Radeon R9 M375X

GeForce GTX 650
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M375X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M375X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M375X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 650 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 650 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 105.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 650 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+105.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 650 and Radeon R9 M375X

GeForce GTX 650
The GeForce GTX 650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,756 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon R9 M375X
The Radeon R9 M375X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,711 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 scores 1,756 and the Radeon R9 M375X reaches 1,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M375X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 650) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375X). Raw compute: 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,756+3% | 1,711 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8125 TFLOPS | 1.299 TFLOPS+60% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 650 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M375X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 draws 65W versus the Radeon R9 M375X's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 650) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-13% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 27.0+18% | 22.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 650 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon R9 M375X launched at $250 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 650 costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 70.2 (GeForce GTX 650) vs 34.2 (Radeon R9 M375X) — the GeForce GTX 650 offers 105.3% better value. The Radeon R9 M375X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-56% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-50% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 70.2+105% | 34.2 |
| Codename | GK107 | Tropo |
| Release | September 6 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #719 | #727 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















