GeForce GTX 675M SLI
VS
GeForce GTX 590

GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs GeForce GTX 590

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

2011Core: 620 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 590

2011Core: 607 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is positioned at rank #566 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675M SLI

#556
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3280%
#558
2973%
#559
2966%
#563
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2697%
#564
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2678%
#566
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#567
100%
#568
99%
#569
99%
#570
99%
#571
Radeon R5 M315
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#572
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
MSRP: $599|Avg: $300
98%
#573
GeForce 9400 GT
MSRP: $59|Avg: $20
98%
#574
97%
#575
GeForce 240M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
97%
#576
96%
#577
GeForce 310
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
96%
#578
Radeon R5 M320
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#579
96%
#580
GeForce 9600 GT
MSRP: $149|Avg: $20
96%
#581
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 590 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 675M SLI.

InsightGeForce GTX 675M SLIGeForce GTX 590
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 590 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 675M SLI and GeForce GTX 590

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 590

The GeForce GTX 590 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,341 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI scores 3,311 and the GeForce GTX 590 reaches 3,341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 590 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 590).

FeatureGeForce GTX 675M SLIGeForce GTX 590
G3D Mark Score
3,311
3,341
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
768
1024 ×2+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 675M SLIGeForce GTX 590
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 590 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 590 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 675M SLIGeForce GTX 590
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
3 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 590). OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 675M SLIGeForce GTX 590
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.0
4.6+15%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 590).

FeatureGeForce GTX 675M SLIGeForce GTX 590
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD (VP5)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI draws 2W versus the GeForce GTX 590's 365W — a 197.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 700W (GeForce GTX 590). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 92°C vs 90°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 675M SLIGeForce GTX 590
TDP
2W-99%
365W
Recommended PSU
350W-50%
700W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
2x 8-pin
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
92°C
90°C-2%
Perf/Watt
1655.5+17895%
9.2