
GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 755M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is positioned at rank 566 and the GeForce GT 755M SLI is on rank 285, so the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 755M SLI.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 675M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 675M SLI and GeForce GT 755M SLI

GeForce GTX 675M SLI
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

GeForce GT 755M SLI
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI scores 3,311 and the GeForce GT 755M SLI reaches 3,280 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce GT 755M SLI uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,280 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.1+2% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC (1st Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI draws 2W versus the GeForce GT 755M SLI's 2W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M SLI) vs 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 92°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 2W | 2W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 92°C | 90°C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 1655.5 | 1640.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | GeForce GT 755M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | N12E-GTX2 | N14P-? |
| Release | January 6 2011 | November 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #557 | #554 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















