GeForce GTX 675M vs FirePro M5100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank #129 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675M

#119

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

293%

#121

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

265%

#122

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

265%

#126

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

241%

#127

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

239%

#129

GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#131

GeForce GT 335M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

99%

#139

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro M5100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 675M.

Insight	GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro M5100
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro M5100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

FirePro M5100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 675M and FirePro M5100

GeForce GTX 675M

The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.

FirePro M5100

The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 675M scores 1,855 and the FirePro M5100 reaches 1,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the FirePro M5100 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 640 (FirePro M5100). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro M5100
G3D Mark Score	1,855	1,874+1%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS	0.992 TFLOPS+4%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	512 KB+220%	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro M5100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 256 KB (FirePro M5100) — the GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro M5100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12 (FL11_1) (FirePro M5100). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro M5100
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (FL11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 675M) vs H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro M5100
Encoder	No NVENC (Fermi)	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the FirePro M5100's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (FirePro M5100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	FirePro M5100
TDP	100W-33%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	82mm
Height	—	70mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	82°C	75°C-9%
Perf/Watt	18.6+49%	12.5