GeForce GTX 675M vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank #129 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675M

#119

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

293%

#121

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

265%

#122

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

265%

#126

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

241%

#127

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

239%

#129

GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#131

GeForce GT 335M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

99%

#139

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 675M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560 SE.

Insight	GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 675M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 SE Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 675M and GeForce GTX 560 SE

GeForce GTX 675M

The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.

GeForce GTX 560 SE

The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 675M scores 1,855 and the GeForce GTX 560 SE reaches 1,847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 SE uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 560 SE
G3D Mark Score	1,855	1,847
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+33%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS+12%	0.8479 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+33%	24
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	512 KB+33%	384 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+33%	384 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 675M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 675M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 560 SE
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	96 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+33%	384 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 560 SE
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_0
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 675M) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Encoder	No NVENC (Fermi)	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 560 SE's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin.