
GeForce GTX 675M

Radeon R9 M360
GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon R9 M360 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon R9 M360 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon R9 M360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 675M
2012Why buy it
- ✅133.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M360
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 675M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon R9 M360 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 675M
The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.

Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 675M scores 1,855 and the Radeon R9 M360 reaches 1,819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,855+2% | 1,819 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9523 TFLOPS | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M360 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M360 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 675M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 675M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M360. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M360) — the GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (Fermi) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.6 | 24.3+31% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R9 M360 (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | GF114 | Tropo |
| Release | March 22 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #704 | #711 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















