
GeForce GTX 680
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 680
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.3% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.2 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.3 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 680
2012Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.3 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.3% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.2 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 680 better than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

GeForce GTX 680
GeForce GTX 680
The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 and the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,609+2% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2560+67% |
| Boost Clock | 1058 MHz+18% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 680 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 680) vs 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — a 25.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 680. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s+25% | 153.6 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit x2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire's 200W — a 2.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 680 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 195W-3% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 256mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 98°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.8+5% | 27.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 680 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire launched at $300. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire costs 39.9% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 18.3 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers 63.4% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $300-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2 | 18.3+63% |
| Codename | GK104 | Neptune CF |
| Release | March 22 2012 | May 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #410 | #350 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













