
GeForce GTX 680MX
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 680MX
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌22% higher power demand at 122W vs 100W.
Radeon HD 7970M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 122W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 680MX
2012Radeon HD 7970M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 122W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌22% higher power demand at 122W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 680MX better than Radeon HD 7970M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7970M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon HD 7970M

GeForce GTX 680MX
GeForce GTX 680MX
The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

Radeon HD 7970M
Radeon HD 7970M
The Radeon HD 7970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,663 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 and the Radeon HD 7970M reaches 3,663 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7970M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7970M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,799+4% | 3,663 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1280 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 680MX gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7970M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970M). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 7970M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Kepler) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Kepler) | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the Radeon HD 7970M's 100W — a 19.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7970M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7970M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 100W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.1 | 36.6+18% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












