GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon RX 560

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

2012Core: 720 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon RX 560 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon RX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon RX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680MX

2012

Why buy it

  • 0.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • GeForce GTX 680MX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 680MX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (3,799 vs 3,682), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 680MX is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 560 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 680MX still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon RX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score
3,799+3%
3,682
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536+50%
1024

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 680MX does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 680MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680MX and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon RX 560
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon RX 560
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC (Kepler)
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1
HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 47.7% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70 C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon RX 560
TDP
122W
75W-39%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
0mm
170mm
Height
0mm
112mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80
70 C-13%
Perf/Watt
31.1
49.1+58%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 560 (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon RX 560
MSRP
$99
Codename
Polaris 21
Release
October 23 2012
April 18 2017
Ranking
#520
#527

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.