
GeForce GTX 680MX

Radeon RX 560
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon RX 560 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon RX 560 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon RX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 680MX
2012Why buy it
- ✅0.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅GeForce GTX 680MX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon RX 560 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680MX
The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

Radeon RX 560
The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,799+3% | 3,682 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 680MX does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 680MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680MX and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Kepler) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Kepler) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 | HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 47.7% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70 C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 75W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 0mm | 170mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70 C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.1 | 49.1+58% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 560 (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Codename | — | Polaris 21 |
| Release | October 23 2012 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #520 | #527 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














