GeForce GTX 760A vs FirePro 3D V8750
GeForce GTX 760A
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V8750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 760A is positioned at rank 483 and the FirePro 3D V8750 is on rank 370, so the FirePro 3D V8750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760A
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V8750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760A.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760A | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 760A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 760A holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1104.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760A | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1104.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760A and FirePro 3D V8750
GeForce GTX 760A
The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.
FirePro 3D V8750
The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760A scores 1,226 and the FirePro 3D V8750 reaches 1,272 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760A is built on Kepler while the FirePro 3D V8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,226 | 1,272+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.009 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+245% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 512 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V8750 has 2 GB. The FirePro 3D V8750 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8750) — the FirePro 3D V8750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+19% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+44% | 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 760A) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8750).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760A draws 55W versus the FirePro 3D V8750's 274W — a 133.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 760A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8750). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-80% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 254mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-6% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 22.3+385% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760A launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro 3D V8750 launched at $1799 and now averages $500. The GeForce GTX 760A costs 92% less ($460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.6 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 2.5 (FirePro 3D V8750) — the GeForce GTX 760A offers 1124% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-86% | $1799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-92% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.6+1124% | 2.5 |
| Codename | GK106 | Tahiti |
| Release | March 17 2014 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #813 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 760A and FirePro 3D V8750
