G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760A

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 70W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
47.3% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅412.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1191.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌27.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 412.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 776.8% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 1,226), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $80 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1191.8% (63.6 vs 4.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760A

The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 760A scores 1,226 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 776.8%. The GeForce GTX 760A is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score	1,226	10,749+777%
Architecture	Kepler	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	768	2304+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.009 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS+571%
Boost Clock	657 MHz	1470 MHz+124%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	64	72+13%
L1 Cache	0.06 MB	2.3 MB+3733%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 760A is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760A and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	6 GB+1100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	168 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+33%	96-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 760A) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760A draws 55W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 24% difference. The GeForce GTX 760A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP	55W-21%	70W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	—	160mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	22.3	153.6+589%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760A came in at $249, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 32.1% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1198% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP	$249	$169-32%
Performance per Dollar	4.9	63.6+1198%
Codename	GK106	GA107
Release	March 17 2014	February 2 2024
Ranking	#813	#252

Search GeForce GTX 760A on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.