GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M270X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M270X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M270X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760A

2014

Why buy it

✅30.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M270X

2014

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
0.4% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (1,226 vs 1,204), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 760A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 760A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2.2% (4.9 vs 4.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M270X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760A

The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

Radeon R9 M270X

The Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,204 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760A scores 1,226 and the Radeon R9 M270X reaches 1,204 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760A is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M270X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M270X). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M270X). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 775 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon R9 M270X
G3D Mark Score	1,226+2%	1,204
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+20%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.009 TFLOPS+2%	0.992 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	657 MHz	775 MHz+18%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	64 KB	160 KB+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M270X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon R9 M270X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M270X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M270X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760A and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M270X.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon R9 M270X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760A draws 55W versus the Radeon R9 M270X's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 760A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M270X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon R9 M270X
TDP	55W-27%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	22.3+39%	16.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760A came in at $249, while the Radeon R9 M270X launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 760A was 0.4% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 4.8 (Radeon R9 M270X) — the GeForce GTX 760A offers 2.1% better value.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP	$249	$250
Performance per Dollar	4.9+2%	4.8
Codename	GK106	Venus
Release	March 17 2014	March 21 2014
Ranking	#813	#819

Search GeForce GTX 760A on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M270X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.