GeForce GTX 760A
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
GeForce GTX 760A vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 760A vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 760A vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 760A
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 760A is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌685.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 7W.
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 55W, a 48W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760A vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 760A
The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760A scores 1,226 and the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760A is built on Kepler while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,226+2% | 1,200 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+1100% | 64 |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz+31% | 500 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 760A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 760A gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760A and System on the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 760A) vs QuickSync (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760A draws 55W versus the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)'s 7W — a 154.8% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 7W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 22.3 | 171.4+669% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 760A came in at $249, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) — the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK106 | Lakefield GT2 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #813 | #893 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 760A and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
