GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3060

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
Similar parts
·····
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

2021Core: 1320 MHzBoost: 1777 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3060 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 112.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $699 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

  • 103.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $370 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 281.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 3 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 103.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 79.5% in PassMark G3D (16,995 vs 9,469), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $370 cheaper on MSRP at $329 vs $699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 281.3% (51.7 vs 13.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 9,469 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 79.5%. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1777 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce RTX 3060
G3D Mark Score
9,469
16,995+79%
Architecture
Kepler
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2880
3584+24%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.345 TFLOPS
12.74 TFLOPS+138%
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1777 MHz+91%
ROPs
48
48
TMUs
240+114%
112
L1 Cache
0.23 MB
3.5 MB+1422%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
3 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 780 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce RTX 3060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 7.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Ti and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce RTX 3060
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
12 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
360 GB/s+7%
Bus Width
384-bit+100%
192-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
3 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce RTX 3060
DirectX
12
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce RTX 3060
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC 1st gen
NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 38.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce RTX 3060
TDP
250W
170W-32%
Recommended PSU
600W
550W-8%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
8-pin
Length
267mm
242mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
83°C
75-10%
Perf/Watt
37.9
100.0+164%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Ti came in at $699, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 was 52.9% cheaper ($370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 283% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 (2021 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce RTX 3060
MSRP
$699
$329-53%
Performance per Dollar
13.5
51.7+283%
Codename
GK110B
GA106
Release
November 7 2013
January 12 2021
Ranking
#278
#114

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.