
GeForce GTX 780

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce GTX 780 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 780 vs GeForce RTX 4060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 780 vs GeForce RTX 4060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2013 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌66.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅84.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 310% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 145.7%. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 19,548+146% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+264% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 2460 MHz+173% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+100% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 3 MB+1479% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 24 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 780 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 780 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 5.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+6% | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 24 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 73°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 115W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 550W-8% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 73°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 170.0+435% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 came in at $499, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 40.1% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 311.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $299-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 65.4+311% |
| Codename | GK110 | AD107 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #320 | #84 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















