
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 188% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 350W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Radeon Pro Duo
2016Why buy it
- ✅21.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 350W vs 250W.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Radeon Pro Duo
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 188% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 350W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅21.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 350W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Duo better than GeForce GTX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 780 make more sense than Radeon Pro Duo?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and Radeon Pro Duo

GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the Radeon Pro Duo reaches 8,299 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro Duo uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 8,299+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4096 ×2+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2+97% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 ×2+33% |
| TMUs | 192 | 256 ×2+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1 MB+426% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Duo has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) — the Radeon Pro Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.1+10% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 350W — a 33.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 780 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 500W (Radeon Pro Duo). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8+34% | 23.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499. The GeForce GTX 780 costs 66.7% less ($1000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 5.5 (Radeon Pro Duo) — the GeForce GTX 780 offers 189.1% better value. The Radeon Pro Duo is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-67% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9+189% | 5.5 |
| Codename | GK110 | Capsaicin |
| Release | May 23 2013 | April 26 2016 |
| Ranking | #320 | #309 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













