GeForce GTX 780 vs T1200 Mobile

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780

2013Core: 863 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS

T1200 Mobile

2021Core: 855 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 780 vs T1200 Mobile Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 vs T1200 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 163.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 95W.

T1200 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 95W instead of 250W, a 155W reduction.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 780 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (7,957 vs 7,805), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T1200 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 780 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, T1200 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 780 vs T1200 Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780

The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

T1200 Mobile

The T1200 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,805 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the T1200 Mobile reaches 7,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the T1200 Mobile uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 1,024 (T1200 Mobile). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780T1200 Mobile
G3D Mark Score
7,957+2%
7,805
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2304+125%
1024
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1425 MHz+58%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 780 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T1200 Mobile leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780T1200 Mobile
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the T1200 Mobile carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 780 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 and 128-bit on the T1200 Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780T1200 Mobile
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12.1 (T1200 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780T1200 Mobile
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.1
Vulkan
1.0
1.3+30%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs NVENC 6.0 (T1200 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1200 Mobile).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780T1200 Mobile
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
NVENC 6.0
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the T1200 Mobile's 95W — a 89.9% difference. The T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 350W (T1200 Mobile). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780T1200 Mobile
TDP
250W
95W-62%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
31.8
82.2+158%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is T1200 Mobile (2021 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780T1200 Mobile
MSRP
$499
Codename
GK110
Release
May 23 2013
April 12 2021
Ranking
#320
#325

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.