
GeForce GTX Titan vs Quadro P3200

GeForce GTX Titan
Popular choices:

Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P3200 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX Titan lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX Titan offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX Titan | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $63 versus $70 for the GeForce GTX Titan, it costs 10% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 16.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX Titan | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+16.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70) | ✅More affordable ($63) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX Titan and Quadro P3200

GeForce GTX Titan
The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.

Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX Titan scores 8,181 and the Quadro P3200 reaches 8,578 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX Titan is built on Kepler while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1543 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,181 | 8,578+5% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2688+50% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.709 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1543 MHz+76% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 224+100% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 672 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX Titan comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX Titan offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX Titan draws 250W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7 | 114.4+250% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX Titan launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Quadro P3200 launched at $500 and now averages $63. The Quadro P3200 costs 10% less ($7 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 116.9 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 136.2 (Quadro P3200) — the Quadro P3200 offers 16.5% better value. The Quadro P3200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $500-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70 | $63-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 116.9 | 136.2+17% |
| Codename | GK110 | GP104 |
| Release | February 19 2013 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #311 | #304 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















