
GeForce GTX Titan vs Radeon R9 290X

GeForce GTX Titan
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 290X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX Titan offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (275mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 290X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 290X holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $70), it costs 14% less, resulting in a 20.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX Titan and Radeon R9 290X

GeForce GTX Titan
The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon R9 290X
The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX Titan scores 8,181 and the Radeon R9 290X reaches 8,426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX Titan is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 290X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X). Raw compute: 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 947 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,181 | 8,426+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2688 | 2816+5% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.709 TFLOPS | 5.632 TFLOPS+20% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 947 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 224+27% | 176 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 704 KB+214% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX Titan comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290X has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX Titan offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290X) — a 11.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 290X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X) — the GeForce GTX Titan has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 320 GB/s+11% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 512-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.1+10% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX Titan draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 290X's 350W — a 33.3% difference. The GeForce GTX Titan is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 275mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-16% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7+36% | 24.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX Titan launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Radeon R9 290X launched at $549 and now averages $60. The Radeon R9 290X costs 14.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 116.9 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 140.4 (Radeon R9 290X) — the Radeon R9 290X offers 20.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $549-45% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70 | $60-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 116.9 | 140.4+20% |
| Codename | GK110 | Hawaii |
| Release | February 19 2013 | October 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #311 | #342 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















