GeForce GTX Titan vs RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
GeForce GTX Titan
Popular choices:
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX Titan lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX Titan offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX Titan | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX Titan and RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
GeForce GTX Titan
The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 510 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,485 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX Titan scores 8,181 and the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU reaches 8,485 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX Titan is built on Kepler while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 14.31 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,181 | 8,485+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2688 | 5888+119% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.709 TFLOPS | 14.31 TFLOPS+204% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1215 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 224+22% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 0.22 MB | 5.8 MB+2536% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX Titan comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX Titan offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan) vs NVENC 8.0 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX Titan draws 250W versus the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU's 80W — a 103% difference. The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 500W (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 80W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7 | 106.1+224% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70 | — |
| Codename | GK110 | GA104 |
| Release | February 19 2013 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #311 | #307 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX Titan and RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
