
GeForce GTX Titan vs Radeon RX 480

GeForce GTX Titan
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 480 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX Titan.
| Insight | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 480 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 480 holds the technical lead. Priced at $55 (vs $70), it costs 21% less, resulting in a 33% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70) | ✅More affordable ($55) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX Titan and Radeon RX 480

GeForce GTX Titan
The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX Titan scores 8,181 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX Titan is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,181 | 8,546+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2688+17% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.709 TFLOPS | 5.834 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1266 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 224+56% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 576 KB+157% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX Titan comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 480 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 480 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX Titan. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+13% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX Titan draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7 | 57.0+74% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX Titan launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229 and now averages $55. The Radeon RX 480 costs 21.4% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 116.9 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 155.4 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 32.9% better value. The Radeon RX 480 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $229-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70 | $55-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 116.9 | 155.4+33% |
| Codename | GK110 | Ellesmere |
| Release | February 19 2013 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #311 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















