GeForce GTX Titan
VS
Radeon R9 290X / 390X

GeForce GTX Titan vs Radeon R9 290X / 390X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX Titan

2013Core: 837 MHzBoost: 876 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX Titan offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X / 390X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)
Standard Size (275mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 290X / 390X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 290X / 390X holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $70), it costs 14% less, resulting in a 19.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X / 390X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+19.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX Titan and Radeon R9 290X / 390X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX Titan

The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.

AMD

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,380 points. Launch price was $429.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX Titan scores 8,181 and the Radeon R9 290X / 390X reaches 8,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX Titan is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Raw compute: 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X / 390X
G3D Mark Score
8,181
8,380+2%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2688
2816+5%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.709 TFLOPS
5.914 TFLOPS+26%
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1050 MHz+20%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
224+27%
176
L1 Cache
224 KB
704 KB+214%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X / 390X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX Titan comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX Titan offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — a 11.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 290X / 390X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — the GeForce GTX Titan has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X / 390X
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
320 GB/s+11%
Bus Width
384-bit
512-bit+33%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X / 390X
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.0
1.1+10%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X).

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X / 390X
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
VCE 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC 1st gen
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX Titan draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 290X / 390X's 275W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GTX Titan is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X / 390X
TDP
250W-9%
275W
Recommended PSU
600W-20%
750W
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
267mm
275mm
Height
111mm
109mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-16%
95°C
Perf/Watt
32.7+7%
30.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX Titan launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X launched at $549 and now averages $60. The Radeon R9 290X / 390X costs 14.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 116.9 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 139.7 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — the Radeon R9 290X / 390X offers 19.5% better value. The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X / 390X
MSRP
$999
$549-45%
Avg Price (30d)
$70
$60-14%
Performance per Dollar
116.9
139.7+20%
Codename
GK110
Grenada
Release
February 19 2013
June 18 2015
Ranking
#311
#287