GeForce MX230 vs Radeon R7 M465X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX230 vs Radeon R7 M465X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX230 vs Radeon R7 M465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX230

2019

Why buy it

✅36.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Radeon R7 M465X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX230 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 10W instead of 75W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R7 M465X

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌650% higher power demand at 75W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce MX230 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (1,826 vs 1,787), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX230 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $150 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2.2% (12.2 vs 11.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce MX230 vs Radeon R7 M465X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX230

The GeForce MX230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1519 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,826 points.

Radeon R7 M465X

The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX230 scores 1,826 and the Radeon R7 M465X reaches 1,787 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX230 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R7 M465X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX230) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M465X). Raw compute: 0.81 TFLOPS (GeForce MX230) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon R7 M465X
G3D Mark Score	1,826+2%	1,787
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.81 TFLOPS	0.9472 TFLOPS+17%
Boost Clock	1582 MHz+71%	925 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	16	32+100%
L1 Cache	96 KB	128 KB+33%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX230 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M465X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon R7 M465X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX230 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465X carries 512 MB. GeForce MX230 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX230 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce MX230) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M465X) — the GeForce MX230 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon R7 M465X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	48 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX230 draws 10W versus the Radeon R7 M465X's 75W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce MX230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX230) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon R7 M465X
TDP	10W-87%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	Mobile
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	182.6+667%	23.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX230 came in at $150, while the Radeon R7 M465X launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.2 (GeForce MX230) vs 11.9 (Radeon R7 M465X) — the GeForce MX230 offers 2.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX230 (2019 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP	$150	$150
Performance per Dollar	12.2+3%	11.9
Codename	GP108	Tropo
Release	February 21 2019	May 15 2016
Ranking	#708	#715

Search GeForce MX230 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M465X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.