GeForce MX450 vs GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX450 is positioned at rank #307 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX450
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 356.9% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX450.
| Insight | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-356.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+356.9%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $289 (vs $200), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 216.2% better value per dollar than the GeForce MX450.
| Insight | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+216.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 356.9%. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 16,995+357% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 3584+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+295% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1777 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce MX450) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 350% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 360 GB/s+350% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 148.7% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-85% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+49% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 and now averages $289. The GeForce MX450 costs 30.8% less ($89 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.6 (GeForce MX450) vs 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 216.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-24% | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-31% | $289 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.6 | 58.8+216% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GA106 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #523 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX450 and GeForce RTX 3060
