
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 285W, a 260W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅257.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1040% higher power demand at 285W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570
2022GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 285W, a 260W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅257.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌1040% higher power demand at 285W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce MX570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce MX570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 450.3%. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 64 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,738 | 31,578+450% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 7680+275% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+747% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2610 MHz+126% |
| ROPs | 40 | 80+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 240+275% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 7.5 MB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 60+275% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 240+275% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX570 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX570 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX570 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 425% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 504 GB/s+425% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 167.7% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-91% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 229.5+107% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 launched at $150 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce MX570 costs 81.2% less ($649 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.3 (GeForce MX570) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 3.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-81% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.3 | 39.5+3% |
| Codename | GA107 | AD104 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #407 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













