GeForce MX570 vs Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

GeForce MX570

2022Core: 832 MHzBoost: 1155 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce MX570

2022

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 760M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce MX570 better than Radeon 760M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,738 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce MX570 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce MX570 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $150 MSRP. GeForce MX570 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce MX570 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $150 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 5.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 25W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon 760M make more sense than GeForce MX570?
Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 25W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce MX570. The trade-off is that GeForce MX570 currently gives you 5.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce MX570Radeon 760M
1080p
low81 FPS58 FPS
medium69 FPS37 FPS
high56 FPS27 FPS
ultra37 FPS13 FPS
1440p
low71 FPS40 FPS
medium62 FPS24 FPS
high44 FPS13 FPS
ultra28 FPS7 FPS
4K
low26 FPS13 FPS
medium24 FPS9 FPS
high16 FPS5 FPS
ultra14 FPS4 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce MX570Radeon 760M
1080p
low160 FPS91 FPS
medium129 FPS64 FPS
high99 FPS44 FPS
ultra74 FPS30 FPS
1440p
low118 FPS58 FPS
medium91 FPS38 FPS
high71 FPS29 FPS
ultra53 FPS21 FPS
4K
low68 FPS30 FPS
medium54 FPS21 FPS
high42 FPS17 FPS
ultra29 FPS11 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce MX570Radeon 760M
1080p
low258 FPS245 FPS
medium207 FPS196 FPS
high172 FPS163 FPS
ultra129 FPS123 FPS
1440p
low194 FPS184 FPS
medium155 FPS147 FPS
high129 FPS123 FPS
ultra97 FPS92 FPS
4K
low129 FPS123 FPS
medium103 FPS98 FPS
high86 FPS77 FPS
ultra65 FPS53 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce MX570Radeon 760M
1080p
low137 FPS187 FPS
medium113 FPS149 FPS
high95 FPS133 FPS
ultra80 FPS101 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS127 FPS
medium86 FPS104 FPS
high73 FPS91 FPS
ultra61 FPS68 FPS
4K
low62 FPS75 FPS
medium49 FPS62 FPS
high39 FPS50 FPS
ultra30 FPS35 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

GeForce MX570

The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 versus the Radeon 760M's 5,449 — the GeForce MX570 leads by 5.3%. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570) vs 8 (Radeon 760M) with 64 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce MX570Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score
5,738+5%
5,449
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
8 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
2048+300%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.731 TFLOPS
5.323 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
2599 MHz+125%
ROPs
40+150%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32
L1 Cache
2 MB+1438%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
16+100%
8

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX570 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce MX570Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce MX570Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.

FeatureGeForce MX570Radeon 760M
TDP
25W
15W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
229.5
363.3+58%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).

FeatureGeForce MX570Radeon 760M
MSRP
$150
Codename
GA107
Phoenix
Release
Maio 2022
January 31 2024
Ranking
#407
#421